How Can George B. McClellan Not be Seen as a Disaster?

I guess I am implying that some see him as not a “Disaster” and I think that to be the case, he has defenders does he not?

I am in the middle of a course on American Civil War Command and Leadership, and specifically the Joseph T. Glatthaar book Partners In Command. Glatthaar’s assessment of McClellan is scathing, but then again most are. I know that maybe Dimitri and some others might object, but how on God’s green (er, brown) earth can anyone say that McClellan was not a mitigated disaster and extended the war by perhaps as a long as a year and cost the country so many more lives?

I am obviously not a historian (though I hope I am in training) and am very aware of this. So I understand that I still have more to learn about McClellan.

So for now, lets look at what I know:

  • His habitual inclination of paralysis by over-analysis… to say the least. During his Seven Days Campaign and his Antietam debacle in particular.
  • His arrogance and temperance that did not allow him to work with both those above and below him. In specific, his contemptible behavior towards Pope and his refusal to reinforce during the Second Bull Run defeat.
  • But perhaps most significantly, it certainly appears he was a man who had never really experienced defeat or failure and the thought of it caused him much delay.

Yes, very general statements.

It seems there were very real opportunities to take the war to Richmond in 1862, and perhaps decimate Lee and his army at Antietam, yet McClellan was not able to do so.

So, I ask you, where am I getting this wrong?

1 Comment

Oliver Stone’s New Documentary: Revisionism at its Best…

hitler-mein_kampf_extOliver Stone is no stranger to conspiracy theories and to gross historical inaccuracies (see JFK for starters, Oswald was the lone shooter), and it looks like he is taking on yet more “misunderstood” events and people (thank God for Oilver Stone or we would all be , as he says “ignorant.”); only this time his focus is frankly mind-boggling. (Oh how I wish he’d stick to movies like Platoon, that was a great flick!)

According to the Progressive/Marxist director, “Stalin, Hitler, Mao, McCarthy — these people have been vilified pretty thoroughly by history,” – as quoted at the Television Critics Association in Pasadena. Stone is a Cultural Relativist who is not interested in “secret” or “true” stories about history. (Interesting  how he groups McCarthy with those other three. Whatever.)

We could say that Stone just wants to reexamine these controversial figures and figure out what made them tick, and how they came to be!? Not so fast.

Consider the following:

“Stalin has a complete other story,” Stone said. “Not to paint him as a hero, but to tell a more factual representation. He fought the German war machine more than any single person. We can’t judge people as only ‘bad’ or ‘good.’ Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and its been used cheaply. He’s the product of a series of actions. It’s cause and effect … People in America don’t know the connection between WWI and WWII … I’ve been able to walk in Stalin’s shoes and Hitler’s shoes to understand their point of view. We’re going to educate our minds and liberalize them and broaden them. We want to move beyond opinions … Go into the funding of the Nazi party. How many American corporations were involved, from GM through IBM. Hitler is just a man who could have easily been assassinated.”

Let me get this right!? He is going to tell a more “factual representation” of fascists dictators who did not kill millions, but tens of millions. His comment, “Hitler is an easy scapegoat…” is so full of ignorance and intellectual hogwash… only the mind of a Progressive nincompoop could utter such a stupid statement. Who has used and how has Hitler been used as a “scapegoat”? Neo-Nazis? Facists? I can’t wait to see.

How about this comment, “People in America don’t know the connection between WWI and WWII.” This is pure lunacy. Maybe the Hollywood hacks he hangs out with don’t! Every student that leaves 90% of United States history classrooms in this country was exposed to the relationship between those two events. If anyone does not know how WWI lead to WWII they are ignorant – War reparations, war guilt, the loss of key industrial territory, and thus Germany was destined during the Great Depression to be a breeding ground for a radical, eloquent, and charismatic persona such as Hitler. This purely evil person has nothing that needs to be studied, other than the environment (as already mentioned and including: hyper-inflation in Germany. If you are starving and someone tells you they know who is to blame and how you can live better, you will listen as well.) Besides, what led to Hitler was Germany’s neighbors and what they did; it was created in part by the French and their desire to punish Germany. Will this be explained? I hope so. Will the German people be held accountable? Lot’s of questions.

So will the above be covered and highlighted? Keep reading.

6a00d83451d69069e2012876be446a970c-320wi“I’ve been able to walk in Stalin’s shoes and Hitler’s shoes to understand their point of view,” says Stone. Good, glad to hear it. Only you would want to walk in their shoes.

Understanding the past is a part of the historiography, indeed. Yet the implication for Stone, it seems from the above quote, is to put America in a cause and effect relationship with Hitler, “Go into the funding of the Nazi party. How many American corporations were involved, from GM through IBM.” It could be interesting to see how American corporations were duped by Hitler, just like so many politicians and political leaders. However, will this simply be a way for Stone to imply we are at fault for Hitler’s rise and his designs on Jews and Europe? (I wonder if Stone will talk much about “Mein Kampf”, Appeasement, Ambassador Kennedy to England who saw nothing wrong with the Nazis and Hitler, ect.?)

Note: If you are a teacher who wants to show a good and historically accurate account of Hitler, show your class Hitler in Colour.

According to reports, the 10-part documentary series from Showtime will also focus on events that “at the time went under-reported, but crucially shaped America’s unique and complex history of the last 60 years.” Such events as: President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan and the origins of the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

Showtime is behind the curve here, big time. I wonder if they are aware of how much the Left and the New History movement has already written about these two events for what is going on 3-4 decades now?

However, perhaps the point is that this simply is an opportunity to show America as being just as evil for having dropped two nuclear bombs on innocent civilians when it did not have to (according to one point of view that is not widely accepted by historians)? Forget Hitler, might their point be: how many millions have we killed? I guarantee you there will be some kind of comparison that will imply how we are morally no better than them (the Nazis). Just wait.

I hope I am way off base here. I liked Stone’s movie W. It was an interesting look into Bush and I thought it was fair and revealing.

But knowing Stone’s political viewpoints and his actions abroad, I suspect this series will not be a fair or balanced presentation. It will not be History, and therefore it belongs on Showtime.

So I suggest you get a copy of The Good Old Days: The Holocaust as Seen by Its Perpetrators and Bystanders or maybe to a lesser extent, Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and read them if you want to understand how culture, acute malignant culture, can lead to Hitler. As I doubt Stone will tell that story.

14 Comments

The Terror of Ugly Husbands: Earl Van Dorn

VanDornCivilianA Vicksburg newspaper reporter once referred to Van Dorn as “the terror of ugly husbands.” (Van Dorn pictured left)

The apparently handsome Earl Van Dorn was born near Port Gibson, Mississippi, on September 17, 1820. He graduated from West Point in 1842 and later served in the Mexican War. Van Dorn resigned his commission in the US Army in January of 1861 in order to accept command in the Confederate service as a colonel. After being promoted to major general and named to command the Trans-Mississippi Department, his abilities as a commander came under scrutiny after defeats at Pea Ridge (1862) and Corinth (1862). Van Dorn was relieved of his command and reassigned to command a troop of cavalry. He later achieved his only real success when he attacked a Union supply depot at Holly Springs, Mississippi (December 20, 1862), forcing Gen. Ulysses S. Grant to retreat to Memphis, Tennessee.

But this is not why I am discussing Earl Van Dorn. The reason? The good general was one of the three murdered during the American Civil War. The others were Union Major General William “Bull” Nelson, shot as the result of a feud with then Brigadier General Jefferson C. Davis in September 1862; and Confederate Major General John A. Wharton, shot as the result of an argument with Colonel George Wythe Baylor in April 1865.

Van Dorn was killed in May of 1863 at his headquarters at Spring Hill, Tennessee, by Dr. James B. Peters. Van Dorn was known as a womanizer (hence the Vicksburg reporter) and Peters had accused Van Dorn of having carried on an affair with his wife Jessie. Thus in a fit of rage, or from an impassioned sense of honor, Peters entered the general’s office, walked up behind and coolly shot him in the back of the head. No challenge to a duel or some sort of more honorable confrontation does in context make the act look rather cowardly, nonetheless the results were surprising!

Peters, who had his home/residence confiscated some time before the shooting, was arrested, briefly held, but released and never tried, and later his land was returned back to him! Apparently the accusations were true and some sort of evidence provided???

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Van_Dorn

2 Comments

Elvis Presley – The King – at 75

15-elvis-presley-081407Elvis would have been 75 today, happy birthday to the King of Rock and Roll! My mother was a huge Elvis fan and I have to admit I own a couple of his songs on my iPod. Anyway, to another shining example of American Exceptionalism (and tragedy), Elvis Presley. That he borrowed indiscriminately – at times – from others is true, yet he did it so well. He is the legend. Here he is singing one of my favorite songs:

Leave a comment

What is a Historian?

4610_101012456575518_100000002933518_24986_400581_nThis week was the beginning of our second semester here in Colorado, and in my A.P. United States history class we changed from a block (95 min) class last semester to a skinny (45 min) class. We are up to the Progressive Movement and have found our numbers shrink from 26 to 12, due to the workload and couple of minor accidents… just kidding.

During our 2-week Christmas break I asked my students to not even look at their history book and just enjoy their break, and I am pleased to report they followed my instructions. So this week we took a pause to discuss American historiography. We’ve covered all of the various movements since the 18th Century: Romantics, Rationalists, Realists, Progressives, and up to the more recent Social, Conservative, and New Left movements.

However, I wanted to mention the fabulous discussion we had today that evolved organically and was not intended. The prompt centered on the question, “What is a historian?” All I can say is I wish I had recorded the discussions, simply wonderful!

[Note: Above photo is me -seated in the center- with some of my regular United States history class students from a few years ago. I do not take a lot of photos.]

Leave a comment

The “Myth” of American Exceptionalism

39070666I was called out in an email by a reader (this is not an attack as I respect this reader and hence why I am not revealing their identity) who asked me about my belief in American Exceptionalism and my respect for Gordon S. Wood. The reason being, Dr. Wood’s in his most recent – and by the way excellent book – Empire of Liberty, book writes on page 50, “the myth of American Exceptionalism.” Obviously there is more to it but not enough to go into it. My good friend asked why I did not finally relent that there is no such thing as “American Exceptionalism” and accept that we are no better or worse than anyone else.

First, I had to remind my good friend about the nature of my insistence of American Exceptionalism. It is not what some think it is, I want to preserve some American Myths. Gasp!, MYTHS???

Yes, myths. Second, I needed to refer him to Peter Novick’s That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. More specifically pages 3-5 of the Introduction. As Novick observes, “My use of the term [myth], in accordance with current practice, implies nothing about the truth or falsity of what is being discussed. Rather it is a device to illuminate the important functions which “historical objectivity” has served in sustaining the professional historical venture; and since myths are by definition sacred…”

Myths in this modern context have nothing to do with being false or true, but instead they are events that were unchallenged or sacred for a period of time. This is what Dr. Wood was speaking of. His statement is not a declaration for those who wish to pile on to the Anti-American pile; you know, the cultural relativistic folks. So myths indeed can be events that are not considered untrue.

I believe that every culture is POTENTIALLY “exceptional,” of course, but I simply do not believe many equal our own accomplishments, especially when considered within our limited existence.

I think it good that we question these “myths” so long as we do not dismiss them.

7 Comments

Civil War Command and Leadership

I am week four into my graduate class “Civil War Command and Leadership” at American Public University. It is an online program and I am not embarrassed to say it was my only choice living in an isolated region of Western Colorado where there are no graduate programs. This class is one example of why I am proud to say I am attending APU, a regionally and nationally accredited university. The degree from APU will hang proudly on my wall here soon (I am 18 hours into my masters and will be done with my master’s thesis in a 18 months or so).

The Course Description:
This course is a study of national, theater, and operational command structures of the Union and Confederacy, the leadership styles of key military leaders on both sides, and the evolution of command and control in the war. Major themes include the relationship between the commanders in chief and the generals who led the armies in the field, the relationships between the generals themselves, and the ways in which the relationships described above either served to facilitate or debilitate the causes those commanders served.

9780307427069But most importantly it is the quality of the instructor, Dr. Steven E. Woodworth, who is as prolific of a Civil War historian as I know.

His biography on the APU site reads:

Steven E. Woodworth (Ph.D., Rice University, 1987) is professor of history at Texas Christian University and author, co-author, or editor of twenty-seven books. He is a two-time winner of the Fletcher Pratt Award of the New York Civil War Round Table (for Jefferson Davis and His Generals and Davis and Lee at War), a two-time finalist for the Peter Seaborg Award of the George Tyler Moore Center for the Study of the Civil War (for While God Is Marching On and Nothing but Victory), and a winner of the Grady McWhiney Award of the Dallas Civil War Round Table for lifetime contribution to the study of Civil War history.

Here is his bio on his TCU page:

I was born in Ohio, raised in Illinois (mostly), and graduated
from Southern Illinois University in 1982 with a B.A. in history. Thereafter
I studied one year at the University of Hamburg, in Germany, before beginning
studies at Rice University, where I received a Ph.D. in 1987. From 1987 to
1997 I taught at Bartlesville Wesleyan College in Bartlesville, Oklahoma,
and at Toccoa Falls College in Toccoa Falls, Georgia. At both institutions
I was more or less the entire history department and taught everything from
ancient Mesopotamia to modern Europe and the United States. In 1997 I came
to TCU, where I teach courses in U.S. history as well as the Civil War and
Reconstruction and the Old South. My main field of specialization is the Civil
War. My publications include Jefferson Davis and His Generals (University
Press of Kansas, 1990), Davis and Lee at War (University Press of Kansas,
1995), Leadership and Command in the American Civil War (Savas Woodbury,
1996), The American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research
(Greenwood, 1996), A Deep Steady Thunder (McWhiney Foundation, 1996),
Six Armies in Tennessee (1998), The Musick of the Mocking Birds,
The Roar of the Cannon
(University of Nebraska Press, 1998), The Art
of Command in the Civil War
(University of Nebraska Press, 1998), Civil
War Generals in Defeat
(University Press of Kansas, 1999), This Grand
Spectacle
(McWhiney Foundation, 1999), Chickamauga: A Battlefield Guide
(University of Nebraska Press, 1999), No Band of Brothers (University
of Missouri Press, 1999), The Human Tradition in the Civil War and Reconstruction
(Scholarly Resources, 2000), Cultures in Conflict (Greenwood, 2000),
Grant’s Lieutenants from Cairo to Vicksburg (University Press of Kansas,
2001), While God is Marching On: The Religious World of Civil War Soldiers
(University Press of Kansas, 2001).

Needless to say, I am studying the Civil War with one of its premiere historians, and Dr. Woodworth is one of many I have had and will be studying history with at APU.

Leave a comment

Wig-Wags.com

There have been a few “Best of …” lists, I would never be so presumptions to think that anyone would be on the edge of their seat for my Best of … list. However, in honor or Rene’s new website, if I were to pick a “Best in History” blog, Wig-Wags would be easily the one! Congrats on the new site Rene!Wig-Wags.com - Military History, American Civil War, History Book Reviews_1262570062419

2 Comments

Like Ripe Apples in a Storm: The 151st Pennsylvania Volunteers at Gettysburg

P1010290
By: Michael A Dreese. McFarland & Co, Jefferson N.C. & London, pp 190.

A decade ago historian Michael A Dreese resurrected one of the more unheralded fighting units of the American Civil War. McFarland has recently published a new paperback edition of Dreese’s excellent narrative.

Unheralded as they were one of the “9-month” regiments and curiously enough, they entered the fray at Gettysburg with less than a month left on their enlistment, yet they fought hard and took some of the heaviest casualties. They are an example of American Exceptionalism.

During the first day’s fighting in and around Gettysburg, the 151st Pennsylvania Volunteers fought in an open field for most of the day, at times anchoring the Army of the Potomac’s I Corps left flank. They also supported the Iron Brigade during a key time of fighting.

Eventually I Corps collapsed under the greater pressure of enemy infantry, forcing the survivors to retreat to Cemetery Hill. The demolished group would be held in reserve on the second day. On the third day, the regiment endured Confederate cannonade and then helping to repulse Pickett’s Charge.

The regiment was decimated losing 337 out of 446 men engaged, with a total of 80 killed or mortally wounded. Only the 24th Michigan Infantry took a greater number of causalities and/or deaths of any Union regiment.

Less than a month after the Battle the regiment was mustered out of Federal service.

Leave a comment

8th Wisconsin: The “Old Abe” Regiment

8th_wis_eagle_smallThe Eighth Regiment was organized at Camp Randall, Madison, and its muster into the United States service completed on the 13th of September, 1861, and on the 12th of October, it left the State for St. Louis.

Arriving at St. Louis on the 14th of October, the regiment was soon after sent to Pilot Knob, on the Iron Mountain Railroad. On the 20th, the regiment marched with other forces under Colonel Carlin, to Frederick town, twenty-two miles, where a rebel force under Jeff Thompson, was encountered and totally routed, and pursued to Greenville. The Eighth was stationed in the town to guard the baggage, and was not actively engaged. Returning to Pilot Knob after the pursuit, they engaged in railroad guard duty, taking part in an expedition to the St. Francis River in November. On the 25th, they moved to Sulpher Springs, where they were engaged in railroad guard duty until the 25th of January, 1862, when the regiment proceeded to Cairo, and was employed in guard and garrison duty until the 4th of March, when it moved along the line of the Cairo and Fulton Railroad, and joined the forces of General Pope, near New Madrid, being assigned to duty at Point Pleasant, nine miles below, in the Fifth Division, under the command of General Plummer. Here they were on duty in rifle pits on the river bank, to prevent the landing of the rebel gunboats. On the 7th of April, with General Plummer’s command, the regiment marched to New Madrid, and crossed the river to the Kentucky shore, to assist in the pursuit of the flying rebels after the evacuation of Island No. 10, returning to New Madrid on the 9th.

General Pope’s command embarked on steamers to go down the river to Memphis, but on reaching the vicinity of Fort Pillow, the orders were countermanded, and the transports turned about and steamed up the river to Cairo, thence they proceeded up the Tennessee River and joined General Halleck’s forces in front of Corinth, camping at Hamburg on the 22d of April, and moving on the lst of May, to near Farmington. Here the regiment was placed in the Second Brigade, General Plummer, Second Division, General Stanley, in General Pope’s “Army of the Mississippi.” A reconnaissance in the direction of Corinth was made on the 8th, by the divisions of Generals Paine and Stanley. On the 9th, Major Jefferson, with a detachment, was on duty at the outpost, a mile and a half in advance of the lines, when he was attacked, and after holding the enemy’s skirmishers in check for some time, was obliged to fall back to the brigade. The object of the reconnaissance being effected, the forces returned, leaving the brigade of General Plummer to bring up the rear. The rebels opened with artillery with considerable effect. The brigade was ordered to the top of the hill, where the rebels were found within range, and a brisk fire being opened upon them, the enemy fell back. The brigade then retired to a piece of timber,where they were again annoyed by the enemy’s artillery.

The ground was held here by the Eighth Regiment until the rest of the brigade retired, and the rebels began turning their right flank, when the Eighth also fell back in good order, bringing up the rear of our retreating forces. For the gallantry thus displayed, the regiment received the commendation of their superior officers in general orders.

The casualties in the battle of Farmington, were 5 killed or died of wounds and 14 wounded.

The regiment was under command of Lieutenant Colonel Robbins, and Major Jefferson, both of whom, with all the officers and men, displayed the greatest coolness and bravery in this their first battle with the rebels. The loss of Captain Perkins and Lieutenant Beamish, was greatly lamented.

They remained at Farmington until the 28th, when they marched to the front, about three-fourths of a mile from the enemy’s works at Corinth, and with the brigade, lay down in a ravine which run nearly parallel with the enemy’s works. Here they lay until 3, P. M., while the artillery from both sides played over their heads. At that hour a rebel infantry force advanced to turn their right, and capture our batteries. The battery in front of the Eighth withdrew except one gun. Seeing this, the enemy rushed for it, but just as they were about to lay hands on it, the Eighth moved to the brow of the hill and poured such tremendous volleys into their ranks, as to check their advance, and after some very sharp fighting, the rebels were forced to retire to the woods in disorder. By their promptness and energy, the Eighth saved the right flank from being turned, and the brigade from being routed. This was the last stand made by the rebels before Corinth, they evacuating their works on the night of the 29th.

The casualties in the skirmish before Corinth were 2 killed, 5 wounded.

The brigade joined in the pursuit of the enemy as far as Boonville, capturing a large quantity of stores. On the 12th of June, they marched to “Camp Clear Creek,” nine miles south of Danville, where they remained in summer quarters until the 18th of August, engaged in guard and fatigue duty, and in acquiring thorough brigade and battalion drill. Colonel Murphy was in command of the brigade. On that day they moved to Tuscumbia, Ala., arriving on the 22d. Here Colonel Murphy was put in command of the post, Major Jefferson was appointed Provost Marshall, and the Eighth employed as Provost Guard.

Colonel Murphy left Tuscumbia, with his brigade, on the 8th of September, and proceeded towards Iuka, reaching that place on the 12th, and found it deserted by the Union forces. Three of his regiments, and his artillery were ordered forward to Burnsville, leaving him the Eighth, and about 400 Minnesota men and 2 or 300 Illinois cavalry. This force was attacked next day, by the advance of General Price’s army. Finding himself outnumbered, Colonel Murphy withdrew with his command, and marched to Farmington. Reaching that place, a larger force was sent forward towards Iuka under Colonel Mower, and the Eighth returned with them. Colonel Mower went within two miles of the town, and found it occupied by General Price in force, he therefore returned to Burnsville. For abandoning Iuka, Colonel Murphy was placed under arrest.

The divisions of Generals Hamilton and Stanley, moved from Clear Creek to Jacinto, for the purpose of making an attack on Price at Iuka, from the southeast. At Jacinto, the Eighth Regiment joined the brigade in Stanley’s division, and marched with it, and was present at the battle of Iuka, on the 19th, but being placed on the left, and in the reserve, were not actively engaged, though they had five men wounded. The brigade joined in the pursuit the enemy as far as Aberdeen, when they returned to Corinth, through Jacinto to Rienzi and Kossuth, and arrived at Corinth on the afternoon of the 3d of October, while the battle at that place was at its height. The rebels bad succeeded in driving back our troops from the enter breastworks, and a new line was formed about a mile and a half from Corinth. The Second Brigade of Stanley’s division went to the support of General Davies. The rebels advanced from the old breastworks and attacked the whole line, massing their troops against Davies, and after a fierce and bloody contest, compelling him to retire. Stanley’s Second Brigade, consisting of the Eighth Wisconsin, Eleventh Missouri, Twenty-sixth and Forty-seventh Illinois regiments now moved to the front, taking the position abandoned by our retreating troops, and for a time, checked the enemy’s advance. For more than an hour the brigade held the enemy at bay and under a most terrific fire, fought with the utmost gallantry. They subsequently fell back to within about a quarter of a mile from the edge of the town, with the rest of our forces, where they formed in positions to support the batteries of siege guns and field pieces, planted behind the earthworks which had been constructed by the Union troops. On the next day the Eighth occupied a position in the centre, where it suffered no loss.

The casualties in the battle of Corinth were 21 killed or died of wounds and 60 wounded.

The enemy were pursued forty miles, when the regiment returned to Corinth and engaged in guard duty and building fortifications. On the 2d of November, they moved to Grand Junetion, and took part in the southward movement of General Grant’s forces in his first attempt to reach the rear of Vicksburg, in December, 1862, to cooperate with Sherman’s movement down the Mississippi, being employed at Davis’ Mills, Lumpkin’s Mills, at Waterford, Abbeville, Oxford, Tallahatchie, Holly Springs, and LaGrange, in performing guard duty, building bridges, provost guard duty, and kindred service.

The surrender of Holly Springs, on the 20th of December, with its immense stores for Grant’s army, defeated that enterprise. For this surrender Colonel Murphy, who was in command of the post of Holly Springs, was dismissed the service in February, and Lieutenant Colonel Robbins was appointed Colonel, Major Jefferson Lieutenant Colonel, and Captain Britton Major, of the Eighth.

The regiment moved in January, from LaGrange by way of Corinth to Germantown, Tenn., where they were employed in building fortifications, and guard duty, until March llth, when they marched to Memphis, and joined the forces intended by General Grant to operate against Vicksburg, which were being concentrated near Helena. On the 29th, they proceeded down the river to Young’s Point, near Vicksburg, where they engaged in fatigue duty, digging canal and building roads. The regiment was in Mower’s brigade of Tuttle’s division, of Sherman’s Fifteenth Army Corps. With the Fifteenth Corps the brigade left Young’s Point, on the 2d of May, marched to Hard Times Landing, crossed to Grand Gulf, and proceeded towards Raymond, Miss., driving the enemy before them into Jackson, where in conjunction with General McPherson’s Seventeenth Corps, they assaulted the enemy’s works carried them, and took possession of the Capital of Mississippi on the 14th. Lieutenant Colonel Jefferson was made Provost Marshal, and the Eighth acted as Provost guard, and was detailed to destroy Confederate stores.

They left Jackson on the 16th, and moved to Walnut Hills, forming on the extreme right of the investing force around Vicksburg. Here on the 22d, they took part in the celebrated assault on the enemy’s works. General Mower’s brigade moved up a ravine, marching by the flank in four ranks. The ravine was soon so filled with fallen men that the brigade could not get through. Four companies of the Eighth turned to the right under cover of a hill, and got close under the enemy’s works. The fight was kept up till dark, when the brigade withdrew to their former position, and was highly complimented for their gallantry.

The casualties reported were 4 killed or died of wounds and 15 wounded.

On the 25th, the brigade joined an expedition against General Johnston at Mechanicsburg, and after capturing a large number of cattle and mules, and destroying a large quantity of corn and cotton, they returned to Haines Bluff, and thence proceeded up the Yazoo River to Satartia, and from thence again marched to Mechanicsburg, meeting a force of cavalry and infantry, which they defeated and drove through that place.

The Eighth was the only regiment engaged, and lost two men wounded.

Returning to Haines’ Bluff, they subsequently moved to Young’s Point, and camped, and on the 14th of June, marched to Richmond, La., where they routed the enemy and took possession of the town, capturing thirty prisoners and having six men wounded, returning to their former position at Young’s Point on the 16th of June. They remained here on duty opposite the city while the seige of Vicksburg was progressing, until the 12th of July, engaged in severe and dangerous duty, acting, as sharpshooters, and being exposed to the fire of the enemy’s great guns in the city. They were expected to prevent the escape of the enemy across the river. Occasionally they would receive a shelling, from the rebels, but they were not to be driven from their post. The position was very unhealthy, and the regiment suffered greatly from sickness. On the 12th of July, they moved to Vicksburg, and subsequently went into Camp Sherman, on Bear Creek, remaining there till the 26th of September, engaged in guard and fatigue duty. On that day, the brigade moved to Black River Bridge, and went into camp, and remained until the 13th of October.

Colonel Robbins resigned on the 1st of September, and the regiment remained under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Jefferson.

On the 13th of October, the brigade joined in a reconnaissance in force, under General McPherson, towards Canton, Miss.returning to camp at Black River Bridge on the 19th, where they remained until the 7th of November, when they proceeded to Vicksburg, thence to Memphis, and from there to La Grange, Tenn., and camped. At this point and Saulsbury, nine miles distant, the regiment was stationed until January, engaged in the performance of guard duty and skirmishing with the enemy, together with expeditions towards Pocahontas, against the forces of the rebel Forrest.

On the 27th of January, 1864, they proceeded to Vicksburg by the way of Memphis, and encamped near Black River Bridge on the 3d of February. They participated in Sherman’s famous Meridian Expedition, marching as far as Canton, Miss., and returning to Black River Bridge, thence to Vicksburg, on the 5th of March.

The number of veteran reenlistments were sufficient to make the Eighth a veteran organization, and the men expected to be sent from Vicksburg on veteran furlough, but in compliance with the especial request of General Sherman, the regiment consented to remain and take part in General A. J. Smith’s projected expedition up the Red River, to cooperate with General Banks.

The regiment was in the Second Brigade, First Division, under General Mower. Leaving Vicksburg March 10th, they passed down the Mississippi and up the Red River to Simmsport, and landed. The brigade advanced and charged upon the rebels at Fort de Russy, four miles from Simmsport, capturing several prisoners and some military stores. Continuing up Red River, the expedition attacked and captured Fort de Russy, after a short resistance. Here they were joined by the fleet, when they proceeded to Alexandria. Awaiting the arrival of General Banks army the Eighth, with four other regiments, under General Mower, procceded twenty-five miles to Henderson Hill, where they found the rebels posted with artillery. A detour of fifteen miles was made in order to attack the enemy in the rear. Reaching the position about midnight, General Mower succeeded in capturing the whole rebel force, 350 strong, with 4 guns and 400 horses and other munitions of war. This was done in the vicinity of the rebel General Taylor’s force of 12,000 men. Returning to Alexandria, Smith’s army marched up Red River to Point Cotile, where they waited for Banks’ army, and on the 3d of April, embarked on the transports, and proceeded up to Grand Ecore, 80 miles above, expecting to find the enemy there in strong force. The rebels, however, retired without much show of resistance. On the 8th, Smith’s army reached Pleasant Hill. On that day, General Banks’ army had engaged the enemy at Mansfield, or Sabine Cross Roads, 16 miles in advance of General Smith, and been driven back in disorder to Pleasant Hill. The next day, General Smith’s army, with a part of Banks’ force, received the attack of the enemy, and after four hours hard fighting, drove him from the field. The Eighth was stationed to prevent a flank movement, but was double quicked to the front, and joined in the pursuit. After the battle, a retreat was made by order of General Banks to Grand Ecore, and thence to Alexandria. At Natchitoches, the Eighth held a bridge against the enemy and assisted in repelling an attack on the rear. At Clouterville, the Eighth was attacked by the enemy with artillery and musketry, and after a stubborn contest, against superior numbers, the rebels were driven back in confusion.

Here Captain Josiah B. Redfield, of Company A, Isaac N. Groves, of Company F, Thomas Bowels and Conrad Pahn, of Company G, were wounded.

The retreat continued day and night, and Alexandria was reached on the 26th, the troops being much exhausted from marching and short rations.

General Smith’s army was sent up Bayou Rapids to keep the enemy in check, while Colonel Bailey was engaged in the work of getting Porter’s fleet over the rapids at Alexandria, by means of the dam. On the 4th of May, the Eighth was deployed as skirmishers, covering the army front, and drove the enemy three mi1es. Here, James C. Edgar, of Company I, was wounded severely. As the army, approached Bayou La Moore, the enemy annoyed them by an almost continuous artillery and musketry fire. On the 13th, the retreat was resumed, and the Eighth was sent to hold a bridge in the rear, over which Smith’s army was to pass. They moved next day with the rest of the army, skirmishing with the enemy, and reached Fort de Russey on the evening of the 15th. At Marksville, the advance engaged with the enemy in front. Smith’s army deployed to the right, and moved to Mansurara, where the enemy was found in position. The brigade advanced across an open prairie, receiving the artillery fire of the enemy, but continued until within range of his musketry, when a charge was made upon his guns. Hurriedly limbering up, the enemy succeeded in carrying off his artillery, leaving his dead and wounded on the field.

The Eighth had eight men severely wounded and twenty-five slightly wounded.

On the 17th, at Calhan’s plantation and Bayou de Glaize, the regiment was engaged in repulsing the enemy. Here, Captain Charles P. King, of Company G, was severely wounded. On the 18th, General Banks’ army being nearly across the Atcahfaylaya, General Smith put a part of his force in motion to the rear, and attacked the enemy, who was in pursuit, and after a short and terrible conflict, repulsed and drove them three miles. The Eighth was in the advance, and covered the movement.

In this fight, Lieutenant James T. McClure, of Company F, was mortally wounded, dying next day, and Avery Robinson, of Company D, was wounded, and subsequently died.

The next day, Smith’s army crossed, and proceeded to the mouth of Red River, embarked, and reached Vicksburg on the 24th, and went into camp.

The rebels having attempted to blockade the Mississippi at Columbia, Ark., on the 6th of June, General Smith sent forward General Mower’s division of 1500 infantry and a battery. The enemy were found strongly posted between two bayous, which covered his flanks, while he had a good supply of artillery posted in the narrow passage between the two bayous. After a severe contest, the enemy were driven from their position, and pursued several miles. This is known as the battle of Lake Chicot.

In this affair, the regiment suffered three killed and 16 wounded.

Marching to Columbia, Ark., the command proceeded up the river to Memphis, and went into camp. Here the veterans were allowed to proceed to Wisconsin on thirty days furlough, leaving the non-veterans under command of Captain Williams. These were moved to La Grange, employed as railroad guard, and in July, took part in General A. J. Smith’s expedition into Mississippi, and participated in the engagements near Tupelo, in which Ole Severson, of Company H, was killed. They returned to Memphis after a march of two hundred and sixty miles. Here, they were rejoined by the regiment from veteran furlough.

The Eighth marched from Memphis on the 2d of August with the forces of General A. J. Smith into Mississippi, returning on the 29th. In this expedition, W. J. Baker, of Company A, and U. A. Tewksbury, of Company C, were killed. On the 2d of September, they proceeded by the way of White River to Duval’s Bluff, thence to Brownsville, and on the 17th, marched with the forces under General Mower in pursuit of the rebel General Price, who was making a raid into Missouri. After marching three hundred and fifty miles, they reached Cape Girardeau, below St. Louis, arriving there about the lst of October.

Leaving Cape Girardeau on the 5th of October, the forces of General Mower proceeded up the Mississippi to St. Louis, where the regiment was newly clothed and equipped. Reembarking on transports, they reached Jefferson City, on the Missouri River, on the 15th, whence they moved by rail to Lamoine Bridge. Here they were assigned a position in the expeditionary army against General Price, who was making his way into southwestern Missouri, through Kansas. The expedition reached Little Santa Fe, Kansas, when information being received of the defeat and dispersion of Price’s forces, and that General’s escape into Arkansas, orders were given for a return, which was accomplished by marching and transportation by rail and steamer, so that they reached Benton Barracks on the 15th of November. Resting a few days, and refitting for another expedition, on the 23d of November, they left Benton Barracks, and proceeded, with the forces of General A. J. Smith, up the Ohio and Cumberland Rivers, to reinforce General Thomas, at Nashville, which place was threatened by the rebel General Hood. Landing at Nashville on the 30th, they proceeded and took position in the defensive works south of the city, and on the 15th and 16th of December, took part in the battle of Nashville. Here the Eighth,under Lieutenant Colonel Britton, made four distinct charges on the enemy’s works – in the final one, driving the enemy in a perfect rout, from their last line of defences. In this charge the regiment captured a six gun battery, about 400 prisoners, and two stands of colors. Companies B and D, acting as flankers, surrounded and captured 200 prisoners.

The Eighth lost 10 killed and 52 wounded.

After the defeat of the rebels, the regiment joined in the pursuit, marching 150 miles, and finally encamping at Clifton, Tennessee, on the 2d of January, and moved thence to Eastport, on the Tennessee River. Embarking on the 6th of February, the regiment proceeded with Smith’s Sixteenth Corps down the Tennessee to Cairo, thence down the Mississippi to New Orleans, and went into camp five miles below the city.

The Sixteenth corps of General Smith, moved in transports on the 5th of March, to take part in the investment of the defenses OF Mobile, landing at Dauphin Island, from whence they moved, on the 20th, across Mobile Bay, and proceeded up Fish River ten miles, and went into camp. On the 25th they moved and took position in the lines before Spanish Fort. Here they were constantly employed in fortifying, and the performance of picket duty, until the evacuation of the Fort, on the 9th of April, when they moved to a position before Fort Blakely, and took part in the charge on that place, with a small loss of 3 killed and died of wounds.

After the surrender, the regiment marched 180 miles, to Montgomery, Alabama, where they remained until the 10th of May. On that day they marched by the way of Selma, and took cars for Uniontown, on the Alabama and Mississippi River Railroad. Here they went into camp, and remained until orders were received for their muster out. This was done at Demopolis, Alabama, on the 5th of September, and the regiment reached Madison on the 13th, where they received their pay, and were formally disbanded.

The Eighth was known as the “Eagle Regiment,” from the fact that a live Eagle was carried through all its campaigns, up to the return of the non-veterans, in 1864. This noble bird was taken from the parent nest in Chippewa County, in this State, by an Indian, who disposed of it to a gentleman of Eau Claire County, from whom it was purchased by the members of Captain Perkins’ company – Eau Claire Eagles – by whom it was presented to the regiment while organizing, in 1861. It is needless to say that it was instantly adopted as the regimental pet,and was christened,’Old Abe!” A perch was prepared, and the royal bird was borne with the regiment on all its marches, and into every battle in which the gallant Eighth was engaged, up to the muster out of the non veterans. Perched on his standard above the heads of the men, the bird has been more than once the mark for rebel bullets, but luckily has escaped unharmed,with the exception of the loss of a few feathers, shot away. He returned with the non veterans in 1864, and was presented to the State, and placed in charge of the Quartermaster’s department, and every care necessary is bestowed upon him. At the great Chicago Fair, in 1865, “Old Abe” was exhibited and his photograph disposed of, realizing the amount of about $16,000. He was also exhibited at the Milwaukee Fair, with profitable results. We are told that the sum netted to these charitable objects was about $20,000. He occasionally breaks from his fetters, and soars into his native element, but he has become so far domesticated that he is easily recovered. Occasionally the music of a band, or the noise of a drum will reach his ear, when he will instantly listen, and will respond with his characteristic scream, probably recognizing the strain as one with which the battle field has made his ear familiar. Old Abe has become celebrated in our military annals, and his history is inextricably interwoven with that of the brave and gallant regiment who bore him triumphantly through the field of strife.

Regimental Statistics – Original strength, 973. Gain – by recruits in 1863, 52, in 1864, 236, in 1865, 62; by substitutes, 16; by draft in 1865, 3; by veteran reenlistments, 301; total, 1,643.

Loss – by death, 255; missing, 3; desertion, 60; transferred, 41; discharged, 320; mustered out, 964.

Quiner, Military History of Wisconsin, 1866

Leave a comment