Should George Washington have been removed from overall command by the end of 1777?

In honor of Washington becoming the first elected President on this day (1789).

The best strategy employed during the early stages of fighting was more akin to modern guerrilla style than the traditional European tactics of the day. The murderous sniper attacks of the Patriots on the British during their return from Concord were devastating. (Gen. Nathaniel Greene would use hit and run tactics with great success in the Southern Theater in the 1780s). Arguably the best performances by American commanders in 1777 were Gen. Hartio Gates and future traitor, Gen. Benedict Arnold. Both men played key roles during the Saratoga Campaign (October, 1777), whereby using similar hit and run strategies surrounded and defeated British Gen. John Burgoyne. The defeat and surrender of Burgoyne’s army (6,000 British and German troops) is credited with gaining French support that would be key for American victory in the war. During this same time Washington was facing defeat yet again at Germantown and forced to give up Philadelphia.

Very early on Washington (when he took command) favored the decisive battle strategy. Thinking he could maneuver the British into making another head on charge like Bunker Hill, but on a much large scale, dominated Washington’s mindset. This strategy would prove nearly fatal for the American cause. One could even argue that luck was the only thing standing between Washington and utter defeat during 1776-1777.

portrait_of_george_washington.jpegThe generalship displayed by Washington in and around New York in 1776 was best described by none other than John Adams when he declared, “our Generals were out generalled.” But it was really one general who should have received Lion’s share of the blame, as Washington committed several near fatal mistakes. First, he divided his army in two, thus providing a competent General the opportunity to divide and conquer. Luckily for Washington, he was facing no such general in William Howe who was incompetent. Had Howe unleashed his army and attacked boldly, he could have possibly ended the Revolution in New York in 1777. Second, though half of his army at Long Island was fairly safe, the other half on Manhattan was trapped. Howe cut off Washington’s only escape route and though urged by subordinates to attack, demurred and allowed Washington ample time to formulate a late night crossing of the East River. Howe was incapable of taking advantage of Washington’s blunder and this allowed him time to get his army across.

Washington’s generalship at this time was indecisive, stubborn, and foolish. Gen. Nathaniel Greene urged Washington to conduct a speedy retreat, but inexplicably he delayed. Washington then called a war meeting and allowed his generals to vote, and they did so in support of Greene. Though appearing to give in, Washington ultimately decided to stay and fight it out. As historians have noted, “Washington’s decision to linger on Manhattan was militarily inexplicable and tactically suicidal.”

The inexplicable behavior on the part of Washington did not end there. Though lucky to get his army out of the jaws of defeat, he decided to keep Gen. Greene at Fort Washington with orders to hold at all costs. The result, it fell and 3,000 patriots were killed and/or captured. The effects of this defeat were devastating. Though Greene made the bizarre request to defend the fort, Washington needed to make the right choice and get all his men out. There was no way the fort was going to hold out and there was no way Washington would be able to come to its rescue. Though it delayed Howe long enough to insure his escape, Washington could have still outmaneuvered Howe and avoided defeat during his escape. One thing Washington was good at was his ability to maneuver his army.

But Washington lucked out, as Howe was not capable of taking advantage of Washington’s mistakes. Luck would be something that was consistently on Washington’s side. He was brave in battle and countless times had his horse shot out from under him, yet he survived battle after battle.

Even Washington’s so-called greatest victory at Trenton, 1776 was perhaps only gained by luck. The Hessian commander Gen. Johann Gottlieb Rall was notified by a Loyalist that an attack was coming, yet his order not to be disturbed delayed his reception of the intelligence in time to act. Weather put Washington three hours behind schedule and increased the chances of being discovered. Three of his four units never materialized having failed to cross the Delaware River, a near calamitous development that could have had drastic consequences. Washington’s plan was complicated and daring, and his leadership in battle honorable. However, though 800 plus Hessians captured, over 500 escaped. Had this force of 1300 been alerted and prepared, it is probable that the fight would have been extremely bloody and could have resulted in total defeat, as Washington once again placed himself with a river in his rear. Additionally, the victory was more morale than material. The loss of only 800 Hessians was minor compared to Saratoga.

Washington’s army was a shell of its former self at the end of 1776 with just a few thousand men healthy enough to fight. The year of 1777 was not much kinder. Defeats at Brandywine, Germantown, and the loss of Philadelphia were demoralizing for Washington’s army. Wherever the British army wanted to go, Washington seemed incapable of stopping it.

But luckily for the fledgling United States, and Washington, he was not removed from command when one could argue he should have been. Washington would develop his Fabien strategy, though reluctantly, and outlast the invaders. He would win the war. His generalship improved along with his ability to adapt. In the end, Washington was the right person in the right place and at the right time. But, nonetheless, perhaps he should not have been. Imagine how different our history would be without him after 1777.

1 Comment

Why Are Newspapers Dying?

new-york-times-ad-front-page.jpgUsing data from 395 daily U.S. newspapers the Audit Bureau of Circulations reported today a declined of 7.1% for October-March in daily newspaper circulation from the same six-month span in 2007-2008. It cited that The New York Times circulation fell 3.6 percent to 1,039,031, while the Los Angeles Times faded 6.6 percent to 723,181. (Read Story)

This decline in circulation has been a consistent theme and as we know the NY Times is on the brink of a financial meltdown.  Why is this happening?

I have to admit it has been 8+ years since I was a subscriber to a newspaper. I barely read our local paper. I get all of my news online, on demand. It’s there waiting for me when I want it. I also can select what I wish to read and what not.

But my question is, Are newspaper sales plummeting because of the perception (and reality) that they are biased and do not report “the news”, but their own skewed take on it? Or are newspapers failing simply because of the Internet?

It’s a fair question and it relates to culturally what could be interpreted as a shift in American news consumption. From Cable and Television news stations to Newspapers, we associate them all with being a “liberal” or “conservative” media outlet. This was not always the case! Are Americans tired of media bias and the misrepresentation (from the right and left) in reporting? Are we flocking online because we can seek out news sources that we deem “fair”? Or is it the opposite, we can seek out “like minded” news sources? Is it a convenience issue? Laziness? Are we becoming more environmentally conscious?

I think it is worthy of study.

But that’s just me and sometimes I ain’t there… here I mean.

2 Comments

Behind Closed Doors

 wwii-behind-closed-doors-logo-copy.jpg

I received today my review copy of the upcoming PBS miniseries “Behind Closed Doors: Stalin, the Nazis and the West,” which, according to the press kit, promises to “change the way we think about the war.” Sounds interesting and I am looking forward to watching this and will report on my reaction to it. The series is scheduled to start May 6th. Check their website for more details.

Leave a comment

Civil War Memory moved… Other Blogs REMOVED

I hate to do it, but I removed the “Civil War Memory” blog from my list and not because I have any intellectual issue (or anything) with the “Civil War Memory” blog, as a matter a fact it has been a daily stop for several years and will continue to be so! However, I do so as it has removed my blog from its front page. I have my blogroll on the main page in support of my fellow bloggers and they support me in kind. Sorry, but I cannot continue to have links on my main page and then lose web surfers to those sites that do not return the favor in kind. I have also removed several other blogs that did not return the link on their home page. I did not come to this decision easily, but fair is fair. I do not have a secondary blog roll list page.

UPDATE: I moved Civil War Memory to my non-monitored “Resources” list on the bottom right.  Down there no one will ever see it, which is in line with the placement of blogs on that site.

5 Comments

What I am Reading

Thomas Paine’s place in American History is secure but that wasn’t always the case. He died in relative obscurity after having made the mistake of taking on the Federalists, who viciously attacked Paine. Also, his mistaken commitment to the French Revolution also contributed to his downfall. Though always a friend to Thomas Jefferson, when Paine returned to America he was not beloved. I have to write a five- page paper on Paine this weekend and it centers on (as instructed by our professor), of course, his famous pamphlet “Common Sense.”  We are to quote directly from the text and in doing so are to present an argument for or against its ability to persuade colonials and why? This way we convey our understanding of the pamphlet, as well as other readings. We have to come up with some unique argument. I have to admit that I am not sure how to approach this. It seems so simplistic yet finding that door into it has proved arduous. Note: I have two books here I am recommending to you (right, and bottom left).

Thomas Paine’s popularity today among historians and readers of early American history has numerous origins. It’s not hard to imagine why? He never owned slaves and immediately on his arrival (late 1774) denounced slavery and even joined Benjamin Franklin as a member of Franklin’s anti-slavery society. Paine also was an outspoken critic of the English Crown, parliament and its corruption, but most importantly for modern social historians, he was an advocate of the poor, the downtrodden. His ability to offer clarity, context, and relevance to the debate over separation from the mother country of England for the colonists was essential to the popularity of his famous pamphlet, “Common Sense.” His words would have inspired those Revolutionaries already decidedly for independence, and the simplicity and force of his argument would have swayed those who were “on the fence.” The Loyalists would have, most likely, stayed loyal regardless of Paine’s argument.

I am reading several books on Paine which I highlight here and highly recommend. I am also reading a few other books of note and I share those as well. Everything right now is pretty crazy with 2 graduate classes and a full load of classes I am teaching. The end is in sight however, with just a few more weeks of school to go!

Leave a comment

Civil War Era Book Overdue 52,858 Days to the tune of ahhh, well… $52,858 fee… Book Finally Returned!

Great story! I recently had a $6 late fee from Blockbuster Video and almost passed out, so I am happy Mr. Dau did not have to pay the $52K fine!

Lexington, VA (AHN) – A history book that was taken by a Union soldier from a Lexington, Virginia college’s library in 1864 was returned in February by the inheritor of the item.

The Leyburn Library of Washington and Lee University, formerly Washington College, did not charge fines for the first volume of W.F.P. Napier’s “History of the War in the Peninsula and in the South of France,” which was 145 years overdue.

Citing notes on the book, Laura Turner, technical services director of Leyburn Library, was quoted as saying by Thenews-gazette.com that C.S. Gates took the book on June 11, 1864 thinking it belonged to the Virginia Military Institute, which was just beside the then Washington College.

At that time, the Union troops were raiding the VMI library and later burned it down.

From Gates’ family, the book passed to Lake Forest couple, Myron and Isabel Gates. Mike Dau, the head handball and assistant football coach at Lake Forest College, inherited the book from the couple. The coach decided to return the book to its rightful owner when he and his wife visited relatives in the Washington area in February.

Dau asked the library to exempt him from fines worth $52,858 as the book was 52,858 days overdue.

(Source: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7014801995)

1 Comment

1868 Georgia Negro Killing Letter

4566_12.JPG

Obadiah Warner, Greenville Ga
Apr 13th 1868
to Hon Hiram Warner, Washington City

Dear Sir

As it is about a week since you left home, I suppose a letter will be acceptable by this time. Ape and I got back all right so for us I could see, about half an hour by sun. The horse don’t seem to be any worse from the trip. Ape took him to town and had his shoes taken off. Coldwell made at least a two hours speech to a large crowd of negroes on Tuesday. I was present a short time. He seemed to have them perfectly under his control and got loud cheers from them whenever he desired which was pretty often. On tuesday morning his effigie was swinging by the neck on one of the trees in the Court house yard. I don’t suppose it had any effect only to make the negroes stick closer to him. After this speaking was over they made a nomination for the Legislature that is for Representatives Dr. Smith of Grantville being already a candidate for Senator, Peter Chambers & Bill Hall were nominated. They for some cause was left off. From what I could gather Coldwell insisted upon the nomination of Chambers, and I suppose Gresham engineered for Hall. I don’t know what they will do. Some who pretend to know, say that he will be an independent Candidate and that on the day of election his name will be on the tickets and run through with Hall and Chambers in that way be tricked out of his election. This may be so, but I should think that Coldwell would be a man they would not like to offend in that way. No county officers were nominated. I suppose Gresham will fix that up. After the negro meeting was over, the white folks had a meeting. I do not know what was done as I was not present only that they nominated George Perry and Dr Taylor of Luthersville for Representatives, and I believe they both accept–

During the evening an unfortunate affair occurred in front of Williams’ Store. It seems that Willie Hussey had a quarrel with a negro man which I believed once belonged to Wm N Forest, in the course of the quarrel the negro cursed Hussey, when Hussey fired at him with a pistol two or three shots, and instead of killing the negro he intended, he killed a negro boy about grown who once belonged to Efraim Moffett, a very well dispersed good negro. I inderstand Every body seems to regret it, and think Hussey to blame. Hussey has left for parts unknown. The negro lived but a few minutes. There is a garrison of about a dozen soldiers here, will stay it is supposed till after the election. They reached here on Tuesday evening of the meeting, so that they must have left Atlanta before the difficulty took place. Alexander the candidate for Congress, Dr Miller and others have an appointment to speak here on next Saturday the 18th Inst. We are all well. Frank commenced planting cotton on last Saturday. We had a pest the other night that killed everything in the garden, but peas beets onions & the fruit is not seriously injured. Write as soon as you recieve this. I hope you have written upon your arrival at Washington.

Yours Truly

Obadiah Warner

m-4817.jpgHiram Warner was a Representative from Georgia born in Williamsburg, Hampshire County, Mass., on October 29, 1802. He was appointed by Governor Jenkins as judge of the Coweta Circuit Court and served from 1865 to 1867, when he was appointed chief justice of the State supreme court and was subsequently elected and served until 1880, when he resigned; died in Atlanta, Ga., June 30, 1881; interment in Town Cemetery, Greenville, Meriwether County, Ga.

Leave a comment

The Tulsa, Oklahoma Race Riot of 1921

In 1921 Tulsa was the scene of possibly the worst race riot in American history. It all stated May 31 and continued until the afternoon of June 1, during which more Americans were killed by fellow Americans since possibly the Civil War. I recently had the opportunity to spend some time and speak with filmmaker Harold Jackson III whose documentary BURN explores the events that took place in Tulsa during those terrible 48 hours in 1921. I will be posting more on this in the coming weeks and months. His documentary is in post production and will be out later this year. Here’s a teaser:

2 Comments

Texas Gov. Rick Perry Backs Sovereignty Resolution ?

Civil War Part II?

AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of states’ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“I believe that our federal government has become oppressive in its size, its intrusion into the lives of our citizens, and its interference with the affairs of our state,” Gov. Perry said. “That is why I am here today to express my unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the states’ rights affirmed by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I believe that returning to the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution and its essential 10th Amendment will free our state from undue regulations, and ultimately strengthen our Union.”

Perry continued: “Millions of Texans are tired of Washington, DC trying to come down here to tell us how to run Texas.”

To read more…

I won’t touch this until we get some verification, but wow.

5 Comments

A Brilliant Solution

I am taking a class in graduate school on the American Constitution. I just finished a pretty good book by Carol Berkin called “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution,” and in it Berkin skilfully describes and analyzes the issues, controversies, and events of the Constitutional Convention.

The war was over and independence gained when the fledgling nation was rocked by Shay’s Rebellion. An event so unnerving that it was denounced by virtually all the Revolutionaries from Samuel Adams to George Washington, that it motivated the Confederation to announce that it was calling for a “convention of delegates” from the colonies to meet in Philadelphia for the purpose of strengthening the Confederation. Yet when the delegates arrived to a man they really had no true idea what authority they exactly had? It wasn’t clear to anyone, save James Madison who arrived first and clearly had an agenda. And it would be the nationalists (they became known as Federalists) who would dominate the convention and do so very early on.

When the Convention began in May of 1787 the 55 delegates were immediately sworn to secrecy; which on the sound of it comes off as a tactic of deception (towards American citizens), but in reality it was to product the members and encourage them to speak candidly. Philadelphia was of course a miserable place in the Summer and that added to the edgy mood. Berkin skillfully handles the issues one by one and does so in a very readable manner.  The issues of representation, government structure, state’s rights versus Federalism, electing the President, executive power, separation of powers, ect.

It’s an interesting thing, frankly. The discussions among the members of the Convention in regards to how we were to elect our Chief Executive. The people were seen, by some, as an ill-informed mob that could not possibly be trusted with electing the President. The reasons for this opinion were not that those who were meeting there were elites and regarded those beneath them with contempt, it was out of the impracticable nature of Eighteen Century society. Newspapers, for one, were regional and lacked a “continental”understanding of politics. Most people would not be informed of the issues or the candidates. News traveled slowly, the truth even slower.

Though the members of this Convention clearly outlined a government where the Legislative Branch would dominate, their debates and arguments over the election of the President displayed that they also were very worried about the Executive Branch and its potential power, especially in the hands of a corrupt person. Indeed, we struggle even today.

One note in the negative on Berkin’s book, she gives a very detailed description of Washington’s inauguration where she describes the President saying, “So Help Me God,” which was a surprise as many historians today doubt he uttered those words!

-C

2 Comments