In the News…

Here are some news stories I want to share with you. The following are either interesting, frightening, down right hilarious (not in a good way), and thought provoking. I will let you decide:

First, seems UFOs are making a comeback and tomorrow we will see first hand the reality of it. Purported UFO video to be shown Friday.

Al Gore’s fictional doc-u-drama “An Inconvenient Truth” is now going to be made into an opera. This is frankly a great idea. Fiction should be on stage.

I am teaching economics next year and though the outlook is not bright it seems the economy is holding steady. We’ll see how it is in 6 months.

Al Qaeda is calling on all jihadists “to use biological, chemical and nuclear weapons to attack the West.” We as Americans can take this one of two ways, I guess, either ignore it as the ranting of some third world group, or as a serious threat and a reminder of the situation we are facing.

Finally, what would we do without the United Nations? God bless ‘em.

U.N. Independent Expert On Racism Begins Fact-Finding Mission In U.S. I’m not sure why this is being done, but I have a guess. We have an up-coming election that will feature our country’s first black presidential candidate. Frankly, the U.N. could better spend its time and money looking into the situation in Darfur or maybe even China, and the human rights violations taking place over China’s inability (and neglect) in helping their own people after a catastrophic quake.

1 Comment

What could have been!

One of the first disappointments during the publishing process with McFarland was their decision not to have a dust jack type cover, and to use just plain old library binding. Now for McFarland it makes sense, they do not market their books, and if they do at all it is strictly with universities and colleges.

So anyway, though the binding is clean, durable, and high quality, I still could not help but try to imagine what it could have looked like.

As I have some Photoshop skill (I made most of my own maps by the way, talk about saving money!) I took about 20 minutes and came up with a hypothetical cover art sample. So here they are, first McFarland’s cover and of course, mine (I went without color, but just imagine the possibilities!):

11thwisconsin.jpg 11thwisconsin_mycover1.jpg

The 11th Wisconsin in the Civil War
A Regimental History
Christopher C. Wehner

ISBN 978-0-7864-3210-3
photos, maps, appendices, notes, bibliography, index
248pp. library binding (7 x 10) 2008
Available for immediate shipment

Description
This volume details the Civil War experiences of the 11th Wisconsin Volunteers as they traveled more than 9000 miles in the service of their country. The book looks at the attitude prevalent in Wisconsin at the start of the war and discusses the background of the men who comprised the regiment, 72 percent of whom were farmers. Compiled primarily from the letters and diaries of the men who served in the 11th Wisconsin, the work focuses on the firsthand day-to-day experiences of the common soldier, including rations (or lack thereof), clothing, disease, and, at times, the simple act of waiting. The 11th Wisconsin lost more men to disease than to battle, so their story presents an accurate picture not only of the heroic but also the sometimes humdrum yet perilous existence of the soldier. Appendices provide a list of occupations practiced by the men, dates of muster into service for the regiment’s companies and a copy of a sermon delivered by George Wells after Lee’s surrender in 1865.

About the Author
Christopher C. Wehner is a history teacher in Colorado.

4 Comments

Where has all the Energy Gone!?

This post might be perceived as political, but it is not. I take no side, I blame both Republicans and Democrats alike. I blame the legislative and executive branches. We must realize that Congress has a lower approval rating than George W. Bush for a reason.

Before I address the issues, I want to first stress that I find the topic of energy of vital interest to us today seeing that some think the world has reached its peak oil production. Others predict $12 per gallon prices in our future. In case you didn’t know it, our economy is not designed to handle gas prices as high as $5 PG let alone $7, $10, or $15. The results will be devastating for us.

Why is America so dependent on low cost sources of energy? I have had the pleasure to get to know a German student in my class this year and have thoroughly enjoyed speaking with him at length. In Europe, people take the train, they ride bikes, and they drive small cars. Why?

Is it because they are just plain smarter than us fat and lazy Americans? Are they more energy and environmentally astute? This student responded with a laugh. After telling me that Germany has surpassed the U.S. as the “fattest” nation (which I questioned), he then told me how they had no real options. Everything is close to home. Also, ancient hamlets and towns that today support modern dwellers were never designed to handle cars. If you have never been to Europe, the streets were clearly made for horses, not cars.

Additionally, just compare the size of Germany to the United States. Not only is it smaller, it is very compacted. It’s like driving through Pennsylvania. Every few minutes another town. Nothing out of reach. The U.S. is a sprawling country where people have to rely on cars, trucks, airplanes, and yes trains just to commute to their job, transport their goods for sale, and all the other things our way of life depends on.

The distance factor alone demands that we have cheap sources of energy. You would think Congress, our elected politicians, would know this and take action. So let us look at their actions of recent:

Just today they have paraded the evil oil executives before them so they could grand stand and put on a nice show (this way we all feel better filling up to $4 per gallon knowing that our elected officials are doing their jobs):

If that’s not enough for you, then sit down, because Congress has another plan. Yes, the “Great American Plan:” if you can’t beat ‘em, sue ‘em: House passes bill to sue OPEC over oil prices.

For the love of God! I’d take Bush over these bozos anytime; eh, that’s not saying much.
Finally, they do have a plan. It’s something called “Windfall Profits Tax” on the evil oil companies. Sounds American doesn’t it? Socialism, here we come!

Did you know Carter tried this in the 1970s and it was a disaster! No one applies history anymore.

Did you also know that though the evil oil companies made on paper “record” profits. They also paid “record” taxes. Take away the tax on oil companies, and gas prices come down.

You know, put aside your emotion about the oil executives making $2 million a year. (They are not the only ones who do by the way.) Two million here or there does not result in $4 per gallon gas!

I thought we lived in an open-market, capitalistic economy? These companies take their profits and spend billions of dollars on finding new sources of energy. Take away their ability to make a profit, and you take away their desire to find more oil and ultimately cheaper prices. And yes, they want to bring you a cheaper product!

So how did we get in this mess? Let’s look at that:

When was the last time we developed new areas for drilling? President Clinton wouldn’t allow it in Alaska in the 1990s and Congress has continually denied it. (Some movement lately on this.)

Our government taxes the crap out of oil companies, did you know this? With regulations and environmental controls on energy companies, the United States Congress has created this mess. Along with the presidents of both parties, though we are finally now starting to look to Alaska and other “new” areas to drill for oil. But unfortunately, our government is getting in the way and is hurting you, the little guy just as much as the evil oil companies!

What about nuclear energy? Did you know we could solve our dependency on foreign energy by using nuclear energy to not only supply electricity, but to produce coal-derived oil. The United States contains 25% of the world’s coal. There would be enough to completely stop bringing in foreign oil. Additionally, the U.S. contains the world’s largest belly of natural gas (Appalachian Mountains), yet we import a significant amount of natural gas!? We spend $300 billion a year (and rising) on foreign energy sources. Imagine that being put to other uses both social and environmental!

If we continue to hamstring energy companies and allow overtly aggressive and unnecessary environmental regulation to strangle our ability to produce the cheap energy we need, our economy will suffer.

For example, “because of congress there wouldn’t be any new leases for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, meanwhile China and Venezuela and even Cuba pursued these leases and have just signed 100-year leases on the oil in the Gulf. Also, in congress, they have promised, as all three presidential candidates have also promised, to introduce and pass in the next term a cap and trade legislation bill that will increase the price of gasoline according to the EPA by an additional $1.50.” Thanks pals!

On top of that, because of the regulation congress has put in place, there has not been a single new oil refinery in over 30 years in the continental United States! Thanks again.

I know, the environment. We’re destroying the earth, we’re all gonna die.

Yes, I do not buy into the Al Goreism that so many seem to. I will simply offer a source. One that contains the signatures of over 31,000 scientists, including 9,000+ PHDs, and more experts and legit authorities on the environment than Al Gore or the United Nations has ever thought to consult.

You won’t see this petition on CNN, and you certainly won’t be able to ask Al Gore about it, as he refuses to debate the issue or allow such questions during his “lectures.”

I’m not suggesting that the debate is over, as Al Gore does, but I am strongly stating that there is clearly enough evidence that the earth is simply in the midst of a natural cycle. The above scientists have staked their reputations on it. They have used proven scientific data, not some hypothetical computer simulation such as Gore.

Global warming and the future of the earth is very debatable, clearly. But what is not, the fact that the days of $2.50 per gallon gas are gone; and does not have to be! The United States is falling behind, day-by-day, and our government has allowed it. If we see $5+ per gallon of gas nation wide, as I think we will unless something is done NOW, and it sustains itself over a period of years – perhaps even rising as some suggest to $10+, then we will know true disaster. Without cheap sources of energy our economy crashes and all of us suffer.

We can use oil and nuclear energy and do so in ways that will not harm the environment. (You’ll have to read above link to understand, but will you?) We can get off our dependency on foreign energy sources; we can become a stronger country and lead the way in developing better and more efficient cars, and better and more renewable energy sources. We cannot do this if we become bankrupt and crippled.

The End.

1 Comment

What This Cruel War Was Over

First off let me start by saying I apologize for the lack of posts, I have been in the midst of the last week of school and grading, grading, and more grading has been my sole occupation.

On to the matter at hand. I have already talked about Chandra Manning’s What This Cruel Was Was Over, and, however, as is my way, I have to revisit books that perked my interest. I do this for numerous reasons, which I may disclose at a later time.

Anyway, I find Manning’s book very contemplative. I have been comparing some of her conclusions to my Regiment. The letters I have read by the 11th Wisconsin both support and refute some of her conclusions.

First, let me say that Manning’s book is (for me) so very important. I am not qualified enough to say that “everyone” who teaches U.S. history and Civil War history should get it, but for me personally, it is that book.

I still know respected U.S. history teachers who teach Civil War history from the perspective that the war was NOT fought over slavery, but instead over states rights, evil capitalists, ect. And who also teach that Union soldiers by and large did not acknowledge slavery as an objective of the war until they literally “had” to as means to an end. Or something along these lines.

Manning challenges all this, and frankly does so comprehensively. But make no mistake, this book is a starting point, not an end point.

I do not understand how a rational and intelligent person could argue that without slavery the Civil War would have still happened. You just can’t do it.

However, when it comes to motivations and opinions of the soldiers, here, we have debatable material.

In my own regiment, there are some very convincing letters written by angry soldiers in 1863 stating unequivocally after Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, that if they were indeed “fighting” for the “Negro” they would lay down their arms and go home. (It should be noted that none did.)

What I found, at first, seems to contradict Manning, but looking at it again I realize that of course few white soldiers would have stated they were fighting for the Negroes. But that they fought the war to end the un-republican practice of slavery there can be no doubt.

To have said they were fighting for Negroes would have been difficult for many, and for obvious reasons. But to say they were fighting to end slavery, is very reasonable.

Even within the 11th Wisconsin throughout 1863 their attitudes towards Negroes changes, and in some instances it does so in ways that would have been very unexpected to them in say 1861.

Anyway, more on this (I hope) later…

C

1 Comment

Resources

Lots of new services coming online for a fee, of course. You can get some free previews though. For example, Footnote has an “interactive” 1860 census online. Dimitri pointed out that you can download the non-interactive version for free here.

Another one I found that was searchable was the family search website. Their FREE 1880 online census helped me find and locate a lot of soldiers for my book after the war.
If you’re looking for a searchable archive with letters and diaries, you have my soldierstudies.org, which is free, and Alexander Street Press, which is free now, but will be pay-per-view soon. [Note: there are some issues with the accuracy of ASP, but it is a cool site with a lot of features!]

Leave a comment

A Voyage Long and Strange

A Voyage Long and Strange: Rediscovering the New World21yk2hhxmfl_sl500_aa180_.jpg, by Tony Horwitz, who you might recognize as the bestselling author of Blue Latitudes, Confederates in the Attic, and Baghdad Without a Map. He is also a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who has worked for The Wall Street Journal and The New Yorker.

A Voyage Long and Strange: Rediscovering the New World – Henry Holt & Company, Incorporated, ISBN-13: 9780805076035, 464pp

Horwitz’s book uses a dichotomy not often seen in the realm of history writers. He takes the reader not only on a “journey” through time, but also his own personal journey as he dictates his experiences exploring the geographical paths taken by the explorers he studied. For more on this, see this short video clip featuring Horwitz.

The book is divided into three Parts:

1. Discovery
2. Conquest
3. Settlement

Each is superbly written. Horwitz weaves his two narratives, using one and then the other, and takes us on a magical journey through the heartland of North America. He has a wit and sense of humor that he incorporates into his writing, delivering a wonderful reading experience!

My favorite chapters dealt with the European discovery of the continent, and Coronado’s journey from Mexico to what is today Southwestern U.S.

As a high school history teacher I like to read material that will provide me with interesting facts, funny and alluring historical characters, and comedic and entertainment events. In this, A Voyage Long and Strange delivers!

These details of history help me keep my students interested. All of these are included in Horwitz’s book to keep you the reader interested. I found myself laughing out loud often.

For example, this gem will be incorporated into my class next year:

“The Pilgrims arrived in Massachusetts eighteen years later had a very different experience. Samoset, the first Indian they met at Plymouth, greeted the settles in English. The first thing he asked for was beer.”

Funny and interesting anecdotes like these always deliver with high school age students.

This book is a must read for any high school or middle school teacher and will help you be a better teacher with the knowledge gained and insights from which to tell a better and far more interesting story of North American history.

1 Comment

My Book is #21 on Amazon!!

No not #21 overall, of course, but #21 for Military > Regiments (NOTE: only two other Civil War regiment history books were ahead of mine as of this writing!), but hey, I’ll take it. [UPDATE: today (5.3.08) it's gone, oh well, it was nice while it lasted!]

I’ve been reading Eric’s recent posts about authors and publishing: Things I Wish I Knew Then But Know Now. For some reason it made me feel uneasy. My book, The 11th Wisconsin in the Civil War: A Regimental History, is no great historical work and I am very aware of that. I have to admit I wonder about my book in the same manner Eric questions others. I did not intend to write anything more or less than a narrative of this regiment of heroes.

I found I could not easily pull myself away from my desk once into the rhythm of my writing. This told me it was a good story. I am a screenwriter by trade, and have had to teach myself to think and write like a historian. I’m not even close yet, and I know that.

I did not write or seek out a publisher to stroke my ego, I just simply wanted to get the story of this incredible regiment in print for others to read. I wish this task had fallen on an abler man, but it did not! I do, frankly, worry that I made junior historian mistakes and perhaps that will come back to haunt me. I dunno…

I’ll leave that up to the reviewers. Anyway, thanks for all those who have given me words of encouragement and support!

Chris

2 Comments

New Classroom Rules?

On what has to be one of the best history blogs, Boston 1775, I found the following that got me thinking about changing my classroom rules and adopting some of these (Note, I would be the “Senior.”):

Rules for Harvard’s incoming class in 1741.

1. No Freshman shall wear his hat in the College yard, except it rains, hails, or snows, he be on horseback, or hath both hands full.
2. No Freshman shall pass by his Senior, without pulling his hat off.
3. No Freshman shall be saucy to his Senior, or speak to him with his hat on.
4. No Freshman shall laugh in his Senior’s face.
5. No Freshman shall ask his Senior any impertinent question.
6, No Freshman shall intrude into his Senior’s company.
7. Freshmen are to take notice that a Senior Sophister can take a Freshman from a Sophimore, a Master from a Senior Sophister, and a Fellow from a Master.
8. When a Freshman is sent of an errand, he shall not loiter by the way, but shall make haste, and give a direct answer if asked who he is going for.
9. No Freshman shall tell who he is a going for (unless asked), or what he is a going for, unless asked by a Fellow.
10. No Freshman, when he is going of errands, shall go away, except he be dismissed, which is known by saying, “It is well,” “You may go,” “I thank you,” or the like.
11. Freshman are to find the rest of the scholars with bats, balls, and footballs.
12. Freshmen shall pay three shillings to the Butler to have their names set up in the Buttery.
13. No Freshman shall wear his hat in his Senior’s chambers, nor in his own if his Senior be there.
14. When anybody knocks at a Freshman’s door, he shall not ask who is there, but immediately open the door.
15. When a Freshman knocks at his Senior’s door, he shall tell his name immediately.
16. No Freshman shall call his classmate by the name of Freshman.
17. No Freshman shall call up or down, to or from his Senior’s chamber or his own.
18. No Freshman shall call or throw anything across the College yard, nor go into the Fellows’ Cuz-John.
19. No Freshman shall mingo against the College walls.
20. Freshmen are to carry themselves, in all respects, as to be in no wise saucy to their Seniors.
21. Whatsoever Freshman shall break any of these customs, he shall be severely punished.

1 Comment

Available for immediate shipment!

The 11th Wisconsin in the Civil War
A Regimental History
Christopher C. Wehner

ISBN 978-0-7864-3210-3
photos, maps, appendices, notes, bibliography, index
248pp. library binding (7 x 10) 2008
Available for immediate shipment

Description
This volume details the Civil War experiences of the 11th Wisconsin Volunteers as they traveled more than 9000 miles in the service of their country. The book looks at the attitude prevalent in Wisconsin at the start of the war and discusses the background of the men who comprised the regiment, 72 percent of whom were farmers. Compiled primarily from the letters and diaries of the men who served in the 11th Wisconsin, the work focuses on the firsthand day-to-day experiences of the common soldier, including rations (or lack thereof), clothing, disease, and, at times, the simple act of waiting. The 11th Wisconsin lost more men to disease than to battle, so their story presents an accurate picture not only of the heroic but also the sometimes humdrum yet perilous existence of the soldier. Appendices provide a list of occupations practiced by the men, dates of muster into service for the regiment’s companies and a copy of a sermon delivered by George Wells after Lee’s surrender in 1865.

About the Author
Christopher C. Wehner is a history teacher in Colorado.

2 Comments

What I am Reading…

rollcall.JPGRoll Call to Destiny: The Soldier’s Eye View of Civil War Battles, Brent Nosworthy, Basic Books Inc., 336pp. $27.95. Release Date: March 2008.

Having sifted through mountains of firsthand accounts (many never previously published), Nosworthy pieces together his relevant findings to paint a crisp, clear picture of the Civil War frontlines, from the perspective of soldiers standing on them. Nosworthy’s subjects of interest here are infantry, artillery and cavalry. What was it like to stand behind a cannon and beat back an infantry charge? To take part in a chaotic, fast-paced cavalry raid? To confront the enemy face to face in thick, forest foliage? Nosworthy puts us in the middle of it all.

1858.JPG1858: Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, Ulysses S. Grant and the War they Failed to See by Bruce Chadwick, Sourcebooks, Incorporated,368pp. Pub. Date: April 2008

1858 is the prologue to the American Civil War, ending with the first shots fired on Fort Sumter in the spring of 1861. But it is less a survey of the era than a study of characters: James Buchanan as an odd-looking, maniacal disaster of a president, bent on conquering Paraguay, and John Brown as an imposing, biblical fury, determined to force America to confront the issue Buchanan was determined to ignore: slavery.

To listen to Chadwick discuss 1858 in a podcast, click here.

washington.JPGWashington: The Making of the American Capital, Amistad, Fergus Bordewich, $27.95, Pub. Date: May 06, 2008

Washington, D.C., is home to the most influential power brokers in the world. But how did we come to call D.C.—a place one contemporary observer called a mere swamp “producing nothing except myriads of toads and frogs (of enormous size),” a district that was strategically indefensible, captive to the politics of slavery, and a target of unbridled land speculation—our nation’s capital?

Leave a comment